DENNIS HALTON

Dennis Halton died on Tuesday 22nd September.
Dennis joined the club in 2005.  He was a regular player and played in the Harvey Cup and Tom Fuller Cup sides until ill-health prevented him coming to the club from July 2014.  He was a member of the old Swanley club from 1986 and was an organiser of the annual Swanley chess tournament of those years.
He was also a keen gardener and an amateur artist who displayed his art publically.
We will miss him.
Ian McAllan

Who Runs the Club in 2015?

The officers of the club elected at the annual general meeting are Jack Hollands (chairman), Lee Brockwell (1st team captain and temporary 3rd team captain), Ian McAllan (secretary and treasurer and 2nd team captain), Chris Cheeseman (4th team captain), Stephen Moon (webmaster), Dave Helps (marketing), and Cliff Gregory (club tournaments).

Ian McAllan

Not All Moves Are Equal

In some games of chess, often in the early middlegame, you will likely reach a point where there are a number of plausible moves, each one instigating a slightly different plan which will frame the remainder of your play in the game. In some cases this may be a simple choice of move order, in which certain responses by your opponent must be considered. In others, it may be about creating a target for your pieces, whether that be a forward outpost for your Knights, the creation of an open file for your Rooks, or saddling your opponent with a weak backward pawn. The decision is not often an easy one as it involves projecting your thoughts forward several moves and ensuring there are no tactical flaws in your chosen idea. There are also other considerations, such as remaining time for both players, and a knowledge of the style of position that suits your own play best, or perhaps given a familiar opponent, a pawn structure that they have struggled with in the past.

Active moves are always better than passive ones in this context, they force your opponent to give your play due consideration, whereas passive defensive play allows them to dictate terms. Sometimes if you have a particularly poorly placed bishop the investment of a pawn in order to ensure its freedom is worth it. With the advent of highly advanced engines it is often revealed to be the case that several moves are broadly similar in evaluation in a given position. This allows a player more freedom to steer the game along a path of their choosing. The position below comes after black’s 13th move, in the Cambridge Springs variation of the Queen’s Gambit Declined (Full game and notes attached). Black’s last move was Nd7xe5, completing a pawn exchange on the e5 square.

In the position white has a number of possible candidate moves, examples of which follow the diagram:

Garys diagram of the game position
The Game Position

1) The occupation of the d file with one of the rooks, the King’s rook being preferable while the Queens rook maintains a close watch on the a pawn.
2) Playing pawn to a3, forcing the b4 bishop into a decision.
3) Playing pawn to c5, interfering with the Queen’s protection of the e5 Knight.

The exact position has occurred before, from the games I could find, white had either played a3 with some success, or the rather slow looking Nd1 (leading to defeat), possibly with the idea of shoring up the c pawn with b3 followed by Nb2.

After some minutes of consideration, and at this point a considerable amount of time behind on the clock, white found a very interesting continuation:

14.Nd5!

Putting the position into an engine afterwards, the engine initially preferred the moves a3 and Rfd1, but once Nd5 was entered this started to change. Even after a long period of assessment the move is not rated much better than the previously mentioned moves (and at a similar level to the companion move 14.Nb5), but engines don’t take into account the additional psychological impact of such a move on the second player. Up until this point he had assessed his position as relatively comfortable. The purpose of the move is to put a difficult question to both the b4 Bishop and e5 Knight, the former of which is under threat of exchange and the latter now being en prise due to the interference in the Queen on a5’s defence. In addition there are possibilities of playing Ne7+ advantageously in some lines. In addition the a2-g8 diagonal to the black King is severely weakened, such that taking the Knight with the pawn in exchange for the e5 Knight will lead to a great deal of pressure being exerted by white’s long ranged pieces against the vulnerable black Kingside.

In the actual game black fell apart in very few additional moves due to a miscalculation, starting with …Nxf3+?, losing at least a pawn. Had he found the strongest reply, …Bd6, white would still have had the better game, and some momentum. Should white have opted for one of the quieter but equally good moves from an engine perspective such as a3 or Rfd1 in the position, black would have had the luxury of choosing whether to exchange on c3 to saddle white with weakened pawns, or to complete his development naturally and perhaps consider an assault on the white King’s position later in the game.

Gary